Dose Distribution Prediction by Machine Learning (Random Forest): Impact of Data Specificity in Cervical Cancer IMRT

Y. A. Lestari, A. Munandar, W. E. Wibowo, B. B. Patrianesha, P. Prajitno, D. S. K. Sihono

Abstract


Creating optimal radiotherapy plans is time-consuming and relies heavily on expert judgment to balance target coverage and Organ at Risk (OAR) protection. This study aims to fill the gap in existing radiotherapy approaches by integrating the Random Forest (RF) to predict dose determination in cervical cancer using Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT). A retrospective analysis was conducted using 173 randomly selected cases and 102 specific data (stage I to IIIC1r cervical cancer, without prior surgery, and Whole Pelvic Non-Extended Field). Predictions were based on geometric relationships between organs and absorbed doses, with the model trained using decision trees and hyperparameter tuning via Random Search (RS). Model performance was evaluated using Mean Squared Error (MSE), Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), and P-values. The ML-RF model showed improved performance with specific data, achieving the largest MSE reduction in bladder Dmax (0.017 Gy to 0.007 Gy). All parameters showed P-values above 0.05, indicating no significant differences in mean values between the predicted and clinical data. However, NSE values varied across parameters, with good performance for Right Femoral Dmax (NSE = 0.530) and Left Femoral Dmax (NSE = 0.554), while lower agreement was observed for PTV CI (NSE = –0.167) and PTV HI (NSE = –0.137), suggesting challenges in capturing distribution patterns. These results demonstrate the model’s ability to closely predict clinical dose distributions and underscore the value of incorporating specific clinical criteria. This approach may help reduce clinician workload and support planning standardization, while maintaining the importance of expert clinical judgment. Future studies should explore larger datasets, refined inclusion criteria, diverse treatment approaches, and beam weighting prediction to further improve model accuracy.

Keywords


Treatment Planning; Model Performance; Random Search; Dose Distribution; Data Quality

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Brahme, J. -E. Roos, and I. Lax, Solution of an integral equation encountered in rotation therapy, in: Physics in Medicine & Biology (1982) 27.

C. G. Orton, T. R. Bortfeld, A. Niemierko et al., Med. Phys. 35 (2008) 4911.

J. J. Boutilier, T. Lee, T. Craig et al., Med. Phys. 42 (2015) 1586.

R. Lu, R. J. Radke, L. Hong et al., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53 (2006) 908.

X. Kui, F. Liu, M. Yang et al., Meta Radiol. 2 (2024) 100057.

X. Mao, J. Pineau, R. Keyes et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 108 (2020) 802.

C. McIntosh, L. Conroy, M. C. Tjong et al., Nat. Med. 27 (2021) 999.

T. Giaddui, H. Geng, Q. Chen et al., Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 5 (2020) 1342.

H. Wang, P. Dong, H. Liu et al., Med. Phys. 44 (2017) 389.

X. Zhang, D. Yang, Y. Jiang et al., J. Inflamm. Res. 14 (2021) 4205.

R. Ramlah, M. Fadli, J. Valerian et al., Iran. J. Med. Phys. 20 (2023) 298.

G. Zhang, Z. Jiang, J. Zhu et al., Radiat. Oncol. 17 (2022) 179.

C. Fiandra, F. Cattani, M.C. Leonardi et al., Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 8 (2023) 101228.

C. A. Burmeister, S. F. Khan, G. Schäfer et al., Tumour. Virus. Res. 13 (2022) 200238.

Y. Li, C. Zou, M. Berecibar et al., Appl. Energy 232 (2018) 197.

D. Liu, X. Zhang, T. Zheng et al., Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 303 (2021) 811.

J. D. Ospina, J. Zhu, C. Chira et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 89 (2014) 1024.

C. C. M. Chen, H. Schwender, J. Keith et al., IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 8 (2011) 1580.

S. Albahli, Multimedia Tools Appl. 83 (2024) 52711.

M. H. Rizky, M. R. Faisal, I. Budiman et al., Indones. J. Comput. Cybern. Syst. 18 (2024) 95.

F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort et al., J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (2011) 2825.

L. B. Marks, E. D. Yorke, A. Jackson et al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 76 (2010) S10.

K. Kartutik, W. E. Wibowo, S. A. Pawiro, Comparison of radiotherapy dosimetry for 3D-CRT, IMRT, and SBRT based on electron density calibration, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2016) 012017.

I. Miyaji, H. Fukui, Eur. J. Educ. Res. 9 (2020) 1663.

L. Judijanto, D. M. Priyangan, H. N. Muthmainah et al., Eastasouth J. Inf. Syst. Comput. Sci. 1 (2023) 75.

D. Reijtenbagh, J. Godart, A. de Leeuw et al., Radiother. Oncol. 170 (2022) 169.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/aij.2026.1630



Copyright (c) 2026 Atom Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.