A Fault Tree Analysis and Importance Indexes Approach for Maintenance Optimization of the Chemical Volume Control System in Pressurized Water Reactors

I. W. Ngarayana, A. C. Amelia, P. Widiastuti, M. Meireni, S. Djuliana, L. Masbait, N. A. Syabani

Abstract


Complex systems, such as Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) require regular and effective maintenance to ensure their safety and reliability. Selecting an optimal maintenance strategy is challenging, because it must balance multiple, often conflicting criteria, including reliability, safety, and cost. This study proposes a maintenance optimization framework based on Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and importance indexes, with a particular focus on sensitivity to mission time and failure probability distribution. The framework is demonstrated on the Chemical Volume Control System (CVCS), a vital subsystem of Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs). Using FTA, 176 cut sets were identified, including 11 first-order cut sets where a single component failure (e.g., regenerative heat exchanger, motorized valve 4, check valve 1) could cause system failure. Quantitatively, for a 90 day mission time, 10 components exceeded ASME thresholds (FV > 0.005, RAW > 2), requiring prioritized inspection, whereas for a 30 day mission time, no components required immediate maintenance. These results demonstrate that maintenance recommendations are highly sensitive to both mission time and the assumed failure probability distribution. Unlike previous studies that applied FTA and importance indexes without systematically addressing this sensitivity, the present work explicitly quantifies these effects, thereby filling a critical research gap and providing an operationally realistic basis for maintenance optimization in PWR systems.

Keywords


maintenance strategy, complex systems, NPP, CVCS, FTA, important indexes, time mission, failure probability data.

Full Text:

PDF

References


I. W. Ngarayana, T. M. D. Do, K. Murakami et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1198 (2019) 022005.

K. Jamali, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95 (2010) 935.

K. L. Murty, Materials Ageing and Degradation in Light Water Reactors: Mechanisms and Management, Woodhead Publishing (Elsevier). Cambridge (2013).

F. Schoeckle, H. Rothenhoefer, and G. Koenig, Nucl. Eng. Des. 269 (2014) 281.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Maintenance Optimization Programme for Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, No. NP-T-3.8, IAEA, Vienna (2018).

Y. Yuan, H. Xu, B. Wang, et al., IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20 (2016) 16.

A. V. Klimenko, Nucl. Energy. Technol. 2 (2016) 299.

P. Contri, I. Kuzmina, and B. Elsing, J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 134 (2012) 031602.

J. H. Purba, Atom Indones. 41 (2015) 113.

Z. Zhou, H. Nie Safety, C. Dong et al., Analysis Model of DUCG Based on FMEA/FTA, in: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE26), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), London (2018).

D. W. Jerng and M. C. Kim, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 52 (2015) 122.

D. D. S. Borges, D. D. Lava, A. C. F. Guimarães et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 81 (2015) 249.

K. A. Nguyen, P. Do, and A. Grall, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 168 (2017) 249.

F. K. Hwang, Oper. Res. Lett. 28 (2001) 75.

W. Wang, J. Loman and P. Vassiliou, Reliability Importance of Components in a Complex System, in: Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS 2004). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Piscataway, NJ (2004).

Y. H. Lin, Y. F. Li, and E. Zio, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 65 (2016) 547.

H. Dui, S. Si, and R. C. M. Yam, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 168 (2017) 98.

J. H. Purba, Prog. Nucl. Energy 76 (2014) 73.

T. B. Cochran, Bull. At. Sci. 37 (1981) 37.

A. C. F. Guimarães and C. M. F. Lapa, Prog. Nucl. Energy 44 (2004) 191.

K. Sun, and B. Ho, Nucl. Eng. Des. 193 (1999) 119.

H. Kawai, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 39 (2002) 1269.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Component Reliability Data for Use in Probabilistic Safety Assessment (IAEA TECDOC 478), IAEA, Vienna (1988).

F. Ghaderinia, M. Rahgoshay, J. Jafari et al., Atom Indones. 50 (2024) 249.

H. P. Bloch and F. K. Geitner, Machinery Failure Analysis and Troubleshooting, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston (1983).

E. Clément, A. Rauzy, F. Milcent et al., Arbre-Analyst – Présentation Des Évolutions Du Moteur De Calculs XFTA, in: Proceedings of the Congrès Lambda Mu 23, Institut Pour La Maîtrise des Risques (IMdR) (2022).

P. Baraldi, M. Compare, and E. Zio, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 62 (2013) 37.

F. C. Meng, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 67 (2000) 55.

E. Borgonovo and C. L. Smith, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222 (2012) 301.

D. Mandelli, Z. Ma, C. Parisi et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 128 (2019) 160.

Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), Industry Guideline for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, NUMARC 93-01 Revision 4A, NEI Washington, DC (2011).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/aij.2026.1718



Copyright (c) 2026 Atom Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.