Carbone or Oxygen Therapy: A Comparative Dosimetric Study Using PHITS Code

H. El Bekkouri, E. Al Ibrahmi, M. El-Asery, A. Bardane, C. El Mahjoub, A. Didi, Z. Sadoune

Abstract


Compared to conventional radiotherapy (X-rays or γ-rays), charged particle therapy shows more potential in treating deep-seated and radio-resistant tumors. Currently, all centers that offer hadron therapy use proton or 12C ion. Ongoing research is exploring the possibility of using others heavier ions, such as oxygen ion 16O or helium ion 4He. In this study, Monte Carlo method was used employing the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS), to examine the amount of dose deposited by incident particles of 12C ion with energies of 200 and 300 MeV/u, as well as 16O ions with energies of 237.5 and 358.5 MeV/u. In this study, we investigated the depth dose distribution of carbon and oxygen ion beams by comparing their energy deposition in a water phantom and the impact of secondary particles. When considering lower energies, oxygen ions are more advantageous than carbon ions as they have slightly higher peak input ratios. This property enables higher doses to be delivered to tumor targets or lower doses to healthy surrounding tissues.

Keywords


Hadrontherapy; PHITS code; Oxygen ion; Carbon ion; Bragg curve

Full Text:

PDF

References


H. Bethe, Ann. Phys. 397 (1930) 325.

V. Raj, A. Rai, S. Sharma et al., J. Anal. Pharm. Res. 7 (2018) 175.

J. E. Scaife, G. C. Barnett, D. J. Noble et al., Br. J. Radiol. 88 (2015) 20150172.

A. Bardane, J. Tajmouaati and A. Maghnouj, Moscow University Physics Bulletin75 (2020) 58.

A. Boukhellout, N. Ounoughi and F. Kharfi, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 198 (2022) 31.

A. Khorshidi, A. Rajaee, M. Ahmadinejad et al. Phys. Scr. 89 (2014) 095001.

P. Azimi and A. Movafeghi, International Clinical Neuroscience Journal 3 (2016) 59.

J. S. Nabipour and A. Khorshidi, J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci. 49 (2018) 194.

U. Amaldi and G. Kraft, Reports on Progress in Physics 68 (2005) 1861.

I. Kantemiris, E. P. Pappas, G. Lymperopoulou et al., J. Pers. Med. 13 (2022) 1.

C. Kurz, A. Mairani and K. Parodi, Phys. Med. Biol. 57 (2012) 5017.

T. Sato, Y. Iwamoto, S. Hashimoto et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 55 (2018) 684.

K. Iida, A. Kohama and K. Oyamatsu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76 (2007) 44201.

T. Ogawa, T. Sato, S. Hashimoto et al., Phys. Rev. C 92 (2015) 24614.

S. Furihata, The GEM Code - the Generalized Evaporation Model and the Fission Model, in: Advanced Monte Carlo for Radiation Physics, (2001) 1045.

H. Hirayama, Y. Namito, A. F. Bielajew et al., The EGS5 Code System, 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba-shi Ibaraki-ken, Japan (2005).

N. Ounoughi, Y. Dribi, A. Boukhellout et al., Pol. J. Med. Phys. Eng. 28 (2022) 160.

H. Weick, H. Geissel N. Iwasa et al., GSI Scientific Report (2017) 2011.

D. Satoh and T. Sato, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 59 (2022) 1047.

S. Agostinelli, J. Allison, K.Amako et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 506 (2003) 250.

A. Ferrari P. R. Sala and A. Fasso et al., CERN-2005-010, INFN-TC-2005-11, SLAC-R-773, CERN-2005-10 (2005).

G. Battistoni, F. Cerutti, A. Fasso et al., The FLUKA Code: Description and Benchmarking, AIP Conf. Proc. 896 (2007) 31.

L. S. Waters, G. W. McKinney, J. W. Durkee et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 896 (2007) 81.

A. V Dementyev, N. M. Sobolevsky, Radiat. Meas. 30 (1999) 553.

T. D. Malouff, A. Mahajan, S. Krishnan et al., Front. Oncol. 10 (2020) 82.

Anonymous, NASA Space Radiation Laboratory. https://www.bnl.gov/nsrl/userguide/bragg-curves- and-peaks.php. Retrieved in March (2023).

H. F. Ou, B. Zhang and S. J. Zhao, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 396 (2017) 1825.

M. Toppi, A. Sarti, A. Alexandrov et al., Front. Phys. 10 (2022) 1.

C. K. Ying, D. Bolst, A. Rosenfeld et al., J. Med. Phys. 44 (2019) 263.

L. Rezaee, Razi J. Med. Sci. 25 (2019) 85

V. Vernanda, A. Azzi, S. A. Pawiro, Atom Indones. 49 (2023) 7.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/aij.2024.1352



Copyright (c) 2024 Atom Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.