Strategic Intelligence Analysis in The Integration of National Defense Components to Counter The Threat of Nuclear Terrorism in Indonesia

M. H. Rajagukguk, B. Gunawan, M. Santoso, B. M. Ratmono

Abstract


The development of nuclear science presents multifaceted benefits across diverse sectors, including energy, health, construction, agriculture, and food production. However, the proliferation of nuclear technology introduces the complex challenge of dual-use, encompassing both constructive applications and potential misuse for nefarious purposes such as terrorism. Indonesia, like many nations, faces this dual-use dilemma, necessitating robust defense mechanisms to safeguard against nuclear terrorism threats. This study aims to investigate and enhance Indonesia's defense system against nuclear terrorism by emphasizing integration and strategic intelligence within its defense components. The primary objective is to analyze the integration and coordination mechanisms among the main, supporting, and reserve components of Indonesia's defense system to strengthen strategic analysis and intelligence efforts in combating nuclear terrorism threats. Through a qualitative research methodology employing an analytical approach, data collection encompasses expert interviews, observations, and an extensive literature review. The study identifies various threat risks and potential initiators of nuclear terrorism attacks, highlighting the critical role of integrated defense components in addressing these threats effectively. Findings reveal the indispensable roles of the main, supporting, and reserve components in executing intelligence functions, including investigation, security, and information gathering, to mitigate the threat of nuclear terrorism. Despite their distinct roles, these components require seamless integration and coordination to maximize strategic analysis efforts and intelligence sharing. The research identifies several constraints hindering the effective implementation of integration and strategic intelligence within Indonesia's defense components. These constraints necessitate targeted improvements to enhance the nation's capability to mitigate the threat of nuclear terrorism effectively. In conclusion, this study underscores the significance of integration and strategic intelligence within Indonesia's defense system to confront the evolving threat landscape of nuclear terrorism. By addressing research gaps and proposing actionable recommendations, this research contributes to strengthening Indonesia's defense posture against nuclear terrorism, thereby ensuring national security and global stability.

Keywords


Intelligence Analysis; Intelligence Functions; Integration; Defense Components; Dual-Use; Nuclear Terrorism

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. W. Ajlouni, M. M. Alnairi, K. S. Albarkaty et al., J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 16 (2023) 100572.

A. M. Pluta and P. D. Zimmerman, Surv. 65 (2023) 55.

E. O. Onyeanu, E. M. Ikechukwu, A. T. Ahmed et al., Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 8 (2023) 2585.

W. J. Nuttall, Nuclear Renaissance: Technologies and Policies for the Future of Nuclear Power, 2nd ed, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (2022).

G. Halkos and A. Zisiadou, J. Risk Financial Manag. 16 (2023) 45.

W. Allison, Confidence in Nuclear Energy, Note 37, The Global Warming Policy Foundation, London (2023) 10.

M. Z. Teshome, Eur. J. Law Polit. Sci. 2 (2023) 20.

M. F. Bastug and I. Onat, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology & Criminal Justice, Oxford (2024).

F. K. Ata, Nuclear Security: Weapons and Feaceful Uses in Term of Security, in: Security Studies: Classic to Post-Modern Approaches, Lexington Books, Lanham, Maryland (2023) 261.

C. S. Adigwe, N. R. Mayeke, S. O. Olabanji et al., Asian J. Econ. Busin. Acc. 24 (2024) 289.

M. A. Alkış, Int. J. Nucl. Secur. 7 (2022) 17.

S. Kleinert, The Grand Unified Theory of Nuclear Terrorism Response, APSA Preprints. https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/api-gateway/apsa/assets/orp/resource/item/65b865b366c13817298a6b6a/original/the-grand-unified-theory-of-nuclear-terrorism-response.pdf. Retrieved in February (2024)

C. Ejova, CES Work. Pap. 2 (2023) 173.

J. C. Trajano and M. Caballero-Anthony, Int. J. Nucl. Secur. 6 (2020) 8.

S. Nair, A. Pluff and C. McAllister et al., The Threat from Within: An Overview of the Domestic Violent Extremist Threat Facing U.S. Nuclear Security Practitioners, Stimson Center, Washington, D.C. (2023) 1.

C. Brustlein, Strategic Risk Reduction Between Nuclear Weapons Possessors, Institut Français des Relations Internationales (IFRI), Paris (2021) 11.

L. E. Wilson, M. P. Kessler, J. Ellis-Smith et al., WIREs Forensic Sci. 2 (2020) e1358.

P. F. Walsh, Intell. Natl. Secur. 32 (2017) 548.

S. M. S. Kabir, Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All Disciplines, Book Zone Publication, Cittagong 4 (2016) 168.

K. A. Duncan, The Role of Intelligence in the Prevention of Terrorism (Early Warning – Early Response), in: Handbook of Terrorism Prevention And Preparedness, International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT), Den Haag (2020) 620.

M. Phelps, J. Secur. 34 (2021) 599.

J. Johnson, N. Ritchie and M. Kupriyanov, Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Department for Disarmament, Wina (2023) 116.

V. Narang and S. D. Sagan, The Fragile Balance of Terror: Deterrence in the New Nuclear Age, Cornell University Press, New York (2023) 270.

M. Bunn and N. Roth, The Past and Potential Role of Civil Society in Nuclear Security, in: International Conference on Nuclear Security, IAEA, Wina (2020) 1.

S. Nair, C. McAllister, A. Trentham et al., Bias in Nuclear Security Implementation: Solutions to Identify Threats and Strengthen Security Culture in the United States, Stimson Center, Washington, D.C (2023) 1.

L. Van Metre, Responding to Violent Conflicts and Humanitarian Crises: A Guide to Participants, Springer Nature , Cham (2021) 89.

F. Padoani, Int. J. Nucl. Secur. 6 (2020) 5.

H. Niittymäki, Highlights of International Cooperation for Safety, Security and Safeguards in 2023, Säteilyturvakeskus (STUK), Helsinki (2024).

S. Bar, Compar. Strategy 39 (2020) 321.

A. Polyakov, Russian-American Nuclear Nonproliferation Dialogue: Lessons Learned and Road Ahead, Springer Nature, Singapore (2022) 235.

R. F. S. Budi and Suparman, Atom Indones. 46 (2020) 1. (in Indonesian)

R. Weitz, M. Hoell, K. Isozaki et al., Strengthening International Cooperation in Managing China-Related Proliferation Challenges, Hudson Institute, Washington, D.C. (2023).

G. R. Gibbs, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2014) 277.

G. Guest, E. E. Namey and M. L. Mitchell, Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research, Sage Publications, Inc., California (2013).

S. S. Puleh, E. A. Ikwara, S. Namutebi et al., BMC Health Serv. Res. 23 (2023) 394.

N. Osborne and D. Grant-Smith, Methods in Urban Analysis, Springer, Singapore (2021) 105.

A. L. P. Carvajal and R. D. Sanchez, Int. J. Open-access, Interdiscip. New Educ. Discov. (iJOINED ETCOR) 3 (2024) 380.

M. Abdalsalam, C. Li, A. Dahou et al., CMES 138 (2023) 1427.

N. Nasir and S. Sukmawati, Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan 7 (2023) 368. (in Indonesian)

N. Singh, M. Benmamoun, E. Meyr et al., Int. Mark. Rev. 38 (2021) 1289.

O. C. Enworo, Qual. Res. J. 23 (2023) 372.

A. M. Solarino and H. Aguinis, J. Manag. Stud. 58 (2021) 649.

T. Phuthong, TEM J. 12 (2023) 1142.

A. V. Güntner, A. L. Meinecke and Z. E. Lüders, Leadersh. Q. 34 (2023) 101751.

S. Sumrin and S. Gupta, Establishing Validity and Reliability in Case Study Research Projects, in: The Routledge Companion to Marketing Research, Routledge, London (2021) 119.

J. Liff, N. Mondragon, C. Gardner et al., J. Appl. Psychol. 109 (2024) 921.

C. J. Thompson, J. P. Thompson, and M. A. Burgman, Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003) 901.

G. Bunn, C. Braun, A. Glaser et al., Sci. Glob. Secur. 11 (2003) 85.

E. B. Montgomery, Nuclear Terrorism: Assessing the Threat, Developing a Response, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA), Fairfax, Virgina (2009) 1.

M. Caballero-Anthony, A. D. Cook, J. C. I. Trajano et al., The Sustainability of Nuclear Energy in Southeast Asia: Opportunities and Challenges, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (2014) 1.

N. Busch, Contemp. Secur. Policy 23 (2002) 19.

D. S. Wisnubroto, K. Khairul, F. Basuki et al., Heliyon 9 (2023) e15685.

G. R. Eppich, Bull. At. Sci. 76 (2020) 263.

M. J. Hashmi and A. Ahmed, J. Glob. Peace Secur. Stud. 3 (2022).

Y. Djuyandi, H. Casnoto, M. N. Iriansyah et al., Kurd. Stud. 11 (2023) 1709.

R. A. Zulfikar and B. Erlina, J. Manag. Bus. Soc. Sci. 1 (2023) 136.

L. Wahjudin, JISIP 7 (2023) 3357. (in Indonesian)

S. H. Sumantri, S. Maarif, B. A. Yulianto et al., Int. Rev. Manag. Mark. 9 (2019) 57.

D. Shull, Experiences of Member States in Building a Nuclear Security Infrastructure for New Nuclear Power Programmes, Lawrence International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna (2023).

D. Apriliani, S. Maarif and H. Heridadi, The Conception of National Nuclear Emergency Preparedness System from the State Defense Perspective, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Current Progress in Mathematics and Sciences 2020 (ISCPMS), AIP Conf. Proc. 2374 (2021) 060010-1.

S. S. Saindane, S. Murali, S. D. Dhole et al., Radiat. Prot. Environ. 44 (2021) 47.

I. Soeparna and J. Tanega, Yuridika 37 (2022) 317.

M. Suharmono, Akim and A. Sudirman, Cent. Eur. J. Int. Secur. Stud. 13 (2019) 65.

I. Wardana, Using Social Network Analysis to Inform an Effective Approach to Counter Radical Islamic Groups In Indonesia, Ph.D. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California (2022).

N. K. Bintarsari, Countering Terrorism in Indonesia: A Study of Policy in Counter-Terrorism Measures of the Indonesia National Counter-Terrorism Agency (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme/BNPT), Ph.D Thesis, The State University of New Jersey, 2022

A. Paripurna, The Use of Intelligence in Indonesian Counter-Terrorism Policing, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, 2017.

A. Mardha, A. Mardhi, T. Asmoro et al., Nuclear Security Policy Challenges and Strategies in The Serpong Nuclear Area: A Regulatory Review, in: International Conference on Nuclear Science, Technology, and Applications – ICONSTA, AIP Conf. Proc. 2967 (2024) 150005.

K. J. Hayward and M. M. Maas, Crime Media Cult. 17 (2021) 209.

A. C. Syuryavin, S. H. Lee and N. S. Syam, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 57 (2020) 1131.

G. Chapman, R. Earnhardt, C. Hobbs et al., J. Sci. Secur. Stud. 10 (2021) 123.

F. Lentzos, M. S. Goodman and J. M. Wilson, Intell. Natl. Secur. 35 (2020) 465.

A. Adami and R. Bakhshi, Q. J. Polit. Stud. Islam. World 9 (2021) 75.

T. Meyer, Resour. Policy 86 (2023) 104318.

E. Brutschin, Chapter 20: A new hope for nuclear, in: Handbook on the International Political Economy of Energy and Natural Resource, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2023) 372.

M. A. Rahmanta, A. C. Adhi, H. B. Tambunan et al., Energies 16 (2023) 8089.

A. S. Krass, P. Boskma, B. Elzen et al., Uranium Enrichment and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation, Taylor & Francis, Oxfordshire, (2020).

M. Kibaroglu, Countering WMD Terrorism Good Practices for Safeguarding The CBRN Material, in: Good Practices in Counter Terrorism, Centre of Excellence Defence Against Terrorism (COE-DAT), Ankara (2021).

M. L. Moal, Contemp. Challenges 1 (2020) 43.

E. Coetzee, Between Promise and Peril: African Security in the 21st Century, Institute for African Studies of the RAS, Moscow (2023).

M. Lehto, Cyber-Attacks Against Critical Infrastructure, in: Cyber Security: Critical Infrastructure Protection, Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022) 3.

N. Katagiri, Int. Rev. Law Comput. Technol. 37 (2023) 274.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Combating Illicit Trafficking in Nuclear and other Radioactive Material, IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 6 Vienna (2007).

R. Chesney, Loy. L.A. Int’l & Comp. L. J. 20 (1997) 29.

I. Gindarsah and A. Priamarizki, Politics, Security and Defense in Indonesia: The Pursuit of Strategic Autonomy, in: Indonesia’s Ascent: Power, Leadership, and the Regional Order, England (2015) 130.

N. Asmoro, Marsetio, S. Zuhdi, J. Posit. Sch. Psychol. 6 (2022) 955.

M. A. Hikam, Global: Jurnal Politik International 17 (2015) 1. (in Indonesian)

E. Setyanto, Jurnal Strategi Pertahanan Darat, 8 (2022) 41. (in Indonesian)

National Research Council (NRC), Natl. Acad. Press (2002) 52.

T. Christensen, P. Lægreid and L.H. Rykkja, Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 81 (2015) 352.

Department of Defense (DoD), Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Deskbook, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Science and Technology (DUSD(S&T)), Washington, D.C. (2005).

National Research Council, Performance Metrics for the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture: Abbreviated Version, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C (2013) 1.

J. Doyle, Nuclear Safeguards, Security and Nonproliferation: Achieving Security with Tekhnology and Policy, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011) 1.

A. Khlopkov, D. Konukhov, B. Lee et al., U.S.-Russian Partnership for Advancing a Nuclear Security Agenda, Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS), Vienna (2012).

S. Moore and K. Pease. Police J. 97 (2023) 541




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/aij.2025.1426

Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 Atom Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.