Proton and Helium-4 Ion Beams for Hadron Therapy: Depth, Lateral, and Secondary Particle Dose Calculations

O. Allaoui, A. Didi, E. M. Alibrahmi, E. M. Chakir, Z. Sadoune

Abstract


This study compares Monte Carlo simulations of dose distributions from proton and helium-4 ion beams in an aqueous medium using the MCNP code. Proton beams (60-240 MeV) and helium-4 beams (80-240 MeV, 520 MeV) are evaluated for their ballistic properties in hadron therapy, including penetration depth, lateral dose spread, and secondary particle production. Helium-4 ions, with higher mass and charge, exhibit sharper Bragg peaks and less lateral scattering than protons, suggesting better dose conformity. They also produce fewer long-range secondary particles, potentially reducing unintended dose to healthy tissues. These results highlight the potential of helium-4 ions as a viable alternative to proton therapy for more precise dose control and reduced collateral damage.

Keywords


Monte carlo simulation; Hadrotherapy; Proton beam; Helium-4 beam; Dose distribution

Full Text:

PDF

References


W. A. G. Sauerwein, K. Igawa, J. Herault et al., Health Technol. 14 (2024) 995.

B. T. Essakpa, R. Sebihi, A. Didi et al., Ann. Univ. Craiova Phys. 32 (2022) 9.

A. Didi, H. Dekhissi, Y. Mohamed et al., Ann. Univ. Craiova Phys. 29 (2019) 77.

M. Yjjou, H. Dekhissi, J. Derkaoui et al., Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 76 (2021) S8.

S. Lorenzoni, C. Rodríguez-Nogales, M. J. Blanco-Prieto et al., Cancer Lett. 614 (2025) 217536.

O. M. Kutova, E. L. Guryev, E. A. Sokolova et al., Cancer 11 (2029) 1.

U. Amaldi, Health Technol. 14 (2024) 823.

X. H. Zhu, J. X. Du, D. Zhu et al., Oxid. Med. Cell. Longevity 18 (2020) 5721258.

M. Jiang, B. Qin, L. Luo et al., J. Controlled Release 335 (2021) 408.

S. M. Valle, Helium Ion Beams for Eye Treatment: an in Silico Investigation, Master's Thesis, Università Degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia (2014).

A. Didi, H. Dekhissi, R. Sebihi et al. Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 74 (2019) 364.

L. Volz, C. A. Collins-Fekete, E. Bär et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 66 (2021) 23501.

J. S. Bull, MCNP6.2 and MCNP6.3 Performance Comparison, Los Alamos National Laboratory Presentation LA-UR-23-30469, Rev. 1., New Mexico, United States (2023).

R. Juarez, M. Belotti, A. Kolsek et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 8563.

E. Asano, D. Coleman, G. Davidson et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1031 (2022) 166568.

M. J. Berger, J. S. Coursey, M. A. Zucker et al., Stopping-Power & Range Tables for Electrons, Protons, and Helium Ions, NIST Standard Reference Database 124. https://www.nist.gov/ pml/stopping-power-range-tables-electrons-protons -and-helium-ions. Retrieved in February (2025)

J. Liu, S. Yan, J. Xue et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 478 (2020) 187.

T. E. Bakolia, A. Didi, R. Sebihi et al., Atom Indones. 50 (2024) 37.

H. El Bekkouri, E. Al Ibrahmi, M. El-Asery et al., Atom Indones. 50 (2024) 135.

M. El-Asery, Z. Sadoune, H. El Bekkouri et al., Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 78 (2023) 810.

E. M. Essaidi, M. Krim, O. Kaanouch et al., Atom Indones. 51 (2025) 109.

A. Sari, F. Carrel, F. Lainé, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 (2018) 2539.

International Commission on Radiation Units & Measurements, ICRU Report 78, Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Proton-Beam Therapy. https://www.icru. org/report/prescribing-recording-and-repor ting-proton-beam-therapy-icru-report-78/. Retrieved in February (2025)

S. Mao, K. Xiao, W. Zhou et al., J. Pain Res. 16 (2023) 3925.

A. C. Kraan, Front. Oncol. 5 (2015) 150.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/aij.2026.1717

Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2026 Atom Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.